Cholesterol - the big scam - and we believe it

Cholesterol - the big scam

For years we have been thought that high cholesterol levels are bad for us and that we can die if we do not fix them by medication. Is this a big scam? Can we really trust the doctors and the officials? What is behind the decisions when officials are making their recommendations and decisions.

What are some facts about cholesterol?
1) over 75 year olds having higher cholesterol levels live longer
2) cholesterol is a tread to young men from 30-47 years
3) higher cholesterol is not causing high mortality after 48years of age

Cholesterol is not the cause but the sign:
How does the cholesterol get attached to the veins? Two professors in Finland were not so convinced of the official view of the matter so they (P.Tuohimaa, M.Järvilehto) studied the issue further. What they found was that a lack of oxygen (e.g. caused by smoking tobacco) results injury in the veins, infection causes blood-block and that can cause a heart-attack. Instead of cholesterol being the cause of the problem, cause seems to be the lack of oxygen and high blood-pressure, not cholesterol.

Statins - medication used for high cholesterol
What are statins? Statins are used to lower the bad cholesterol. Statins were found when it was discovered that so called red-rice lowered the cholesterol levels of people eating them. Red color on the rice is actually a type of mold. This mold has naturally high quantity of statins in it. When it it was discovered that statins lower cholesterol levels, statins were developed as a medicine. So if you are eating red rice to lower your cholesterol you are actually eating mold - statins.

What is bad cholesterol?
LDL is supposed to be the "BAD" cholesterol. But study in England showed that the more LDL level got lower the more mortality rate got higher.... interesting!!! If high LDL levels would be the cause of heart attacks then people why is it that many people with high cholesterol do not die for heart attacks?

What are the The hidden side-effects of Statins?
Study in US of a drug called Inegy showed that it is harmful and causes e.g. pancreatic-infections, problems in legs, weakened eye-sight. Study was hidden from the public for 2 years and thousands of people were still eating the medication. In Finland the medication was still used in the Fall of 2010 - some years after the study was made.

What is the situation in Finland?
In Finland some 100 000 people use statins. Seems that doctors can't connect the 60% higher rate of pancreatic infections to the medicine. Some 6 people die each year for the infections. Probably more since doctors do not normally connect the infection and statins.

Why the sudden change in the study results of medication?

10 trials done after 2007 show all negative results - in other words they showed that using cholesterol medication was harmful. Trials done before 2007 cannot be considered reliable since then the negative results were not controlled. From 2007 also the negative results of medication trials have to be published. Before negative results were hidden from public. According to a researcher in France "All trails were manipulated before year 2007".

Why do the doctors doing research approve these false trials?
Cholesterol-hypotheses - if you support that hypotheses you can be sure of financial support from pharmaceutical companies. For a researcher this is something very important. Research relies on financial support. Livelihood relies on ongoing research. It is understandble that in such a situation it is easy to look the other way and approve the manipulated trials. But who is taking care of the little people? The ones dyeing for bad medication?

Let me know what you think...leave a comment!

READ THE TRUTH ABOUT CHOLESTEROL:
Click Here!

Natural medicine verses official FDA's?

Can we trust the official FDA's (Federal Drug Administration) and alike in different countries? Each country has it's own official department responsible for the "official view" of different treatments and medicine. Can these be trusted? What is their relationship to commercial institutes?

Let me first tell you why I am interested of the issue. I was a sickling as a child, constantly having different infections, low immune and antibiotics after antibiotics. By the teenage years I was having antibiotics once a month. I felt myself so tired, and this was supposed to be a "time of my life".  I understood that this cannot go on. I was feeling worse and worse with prescription medicine and that doctors could not fix me.

The peak point was when after straining my back I was given strong painkillers for my back. I could hardly sit down the pain was so bad, but the doctors treated me like someone just wanting to get time off from work. After eating painkillers for a few weeks the problem escalated, I got an infection in my gullet (due to eating so many painkillers). Now I had a new problem that needed medication. 5 months I suffered this problem and was eating medication for the infection. I was dead tired due to high infection levels. And way? Due to the painkillers given to me by the doctor. No more I thought! I went to the library and started reading and reading. I found a book called "Natural Cure with Apple cider and honey" by Dr. Jarvis. Simple remedy cured my infection in just one week - something that the medicine from the doctor could not do in 5 months. That really changed my life!

Ever since then I have been on a request of methods to treat different sicknesses in natural ways. I have read and again re-read many books. Tried many methods. I feel better now than ever before, definitely better than for years. I haven't used an antibiotics for 10 years. I don't go to the doctors if they do not use homeopathy as well. I have learned about sicknesses and cures for them. My friends call me to find out about different options to treat themselves or their loved ones. If I don't know what to do I find out different methods and cures. I can't help myself, I just need to know!

But let's get back to the FDA's. I use plural because I mean all similar officials in different countries. Why do they not accept natural medicine or natural ways of treatment? Bottom line is MONEY. Yes you read it correctly - Money! FDA's are married to Pharmaceutical companies. Doctors are married with Pharmaceutical companies. My mother, who worked for years for a University for the Pharmacological department, always said that doctors are married with the Pharmaceutical companies. How so? These companies start to woe the soon-to-be-doctors already before they graduate. Weekend trips, all you can eat and drink gatherings. Free this free that... By the time they graduate they are fully hooked.

Is it the goal of the Pharmaceutical companies to cure people? Not at all! Why would they want people to get cured? They would loose money. Their goal is to get people hooked into drugs, regular drugs. That is also more profitable for the doctors. In US doctors often give you a prescription for only one month. Why so? That you have to go to visit your doctor again in one month. Hey  - that's regular money for them. In Finland doctors often give you a prescription for 3-6 months even for a hole year. Why is that? The public health system means they get the same payment each month, no matter if you come each month or not.

What proof there is that the FDA's are not always there for the public, but have their own motives? Check out the Burzynski Movie. This doctor was fighting for year against FDA. FDA was trying to steel his work because they did not want a doctor to get the patent for the medicine. FDA had selfish goals (together with the Pharmaceutical companies ofcause) for this new medicine.

Here another example of a cure for cancer that the FDA has dismissed. http://digg.com/news/lifestyle/Scientists_cure_cancer_but_no_one_takes_notice_5http://digg.com/news/lifestyle/Scientists_cure_cancer_but_no_one_takes_notice_5
Why is that? You cannot make money with this!

Another good example of a scientist that has given her research to the public and has helped thousands of people (yours truly included) has been Biologist Dr. Hulda Clark. She was thrown into prison for practising medicine when she was doing scientific research (as a biologist) by using a machine she helped to develop Syncrometer. 

If you still believe that doctors and officials tell you the truth or that they goal is to get you healed - think again! Do not let others choose for you. Find out for yourself. Do a bit of research. Ask around. Read and test methods like Bioresonance by Dr. Clark. Don't be a victim! But do try anything without doing some research first!

Amy

READ THE TRUTH ABOUT CHOLESTEROL:
Click Here!

Here still an interesting Book about cholesterol!